Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy [Arthur Ripstein] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. In this masterful work, both an. Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Harvard UP, , pp., $ (hbk), ISBN Arthur Ripstein’s Force and Freedom is a major accomplishment; there is something to be learned from virtually every page. Ripstein’s goal is to reconstruct and.
|Published (Last):||19 September 2008|
|PDF File Size:||2.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.48 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Freedom means pursuing ends you have chosen, rather than ends chosen for you by others. That Hobbes seems largely to have won out in the way philosophers think about freedom, is attested by the fact that on issue after issue, Ripstein must begin by arguing that from the Kantian standpoint, all the now familiar approaches ask the wrong questions, so that much of this book is a Kantian reformulation of the terms in which familiar issues of law and politics should be discussed.
A Reply Arthur Ripstein. Chapters 7 and 8 emphasize the public and universal function of the law, and the fact that a condition of right requires certain forms of mandatory co-operation that could not, from a Kantian standpoint, be justified on any grounds of welfare or private benefit.
Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy – PhilPapers
I confess I can’t make sense of Ripstein’s line of reasoning here. Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophya seminal work on Kant’s thinking about law, which also treats many of the contemporary issues of legal and political philosophy.
It is purely formal in the sense that it concerns only your rightful claim to pursue whatever purposes you set through whatever freedoj you choose.
The Innate Right of Humanity. This collection of corce takes as its starting point Arthur Ripstein’s Force and Freedom: A Permissive Theory of Territorial Rights.
But Ripstein points out that while “Kant’s understanding of the basic range of public powers is austere in one sense, [it is] permissive in another”. It ought to be a book, he declared, that treedom not start out ripsteij Kantian ethics, but instead expounded Kant’s theory of human rights, law and politics authenticallysolely on the ground of Kant’s concept of Recht: Choice, Ripstein points out, for Kant as for Aristotle, is distinguished from mere wish by the fact that you take yourself to have the means available to pursue your end p.
How can the doctrine of right Rechtif it proceeds independently of the doctrine of virtue or ethics Anx, Ethikalso constitute a part — indeed, the first part — of Kant’s comprehensive theory of morals Sitten? Ripstein’s Kantian account emphasizes that the state, in order to make good the defects of a pre-political condition in these respects must be empowered to act in the name of all its members. Embodied Free Beings under Public Law: Request removal from index.
Sign in Create an account. Ripstein postpones to an Appendix his consideration of this very basic but also very difficult question. In addition to providing a clear and coherent statement of the most misunderstood of Kant’s ideas, Ripstein also shows that Kant’s views remain conceptually powerful and morally appealing today.
The right to a piece of property is basically the right to use frfedom as a means anc. All of the essays are contributions to normative philosophy in a broadly Kantian spirit.
External Freedom in Kant’s Rechtslehre: Kant may redescribe many cases in which his position is thought indefensible.
Force and Freedom
But if the principle of right involves an “extension” of the categorical imperative, and is not a “derivation” from it, how can it also “follow” from it? The fact that Kant’s theory of right is grounded solely on the individual’s right to freedom independence of another’s will has suggested to many it must be libertarian in spirit.
Chapter 1 is a general overview of Kant’s theory of law and justice. In this masterful work, both an illumination of Kant’s thought and an important contribution to contemporary legal and political theory, Arthur Ripstein gives a comprehensive yet accessible account of Kant’s political philosophy. Realism in Normative Political Theory. The innate right to freedom needs to be extended, as Kant argues, to means outside your body through the right of property over things, and rights relating to other persons — of contract and of status — which comprehend the sphere of “private right”.
It emphasizes the interpersonal character of Kant’s neo- republican concept of freedom, and also the equality built into it as purely formal, in contrast to ripsrein that treat “equal” freedom as equal distribution of some benefit p.
Yankah – – Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 2: Added to PP index Total downloads 40, of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 14 34, of 2, How can I increase my downloads? Edmundson – – Ethics 4: Mills – – Res Philosophica 95 1: Ripstein riipstein this interpretation chiefly by arguing on Kantian formal grounds that punishment must be drawn from the nature of the criminal’s act rather than from consequentialist or deterrence considerationsclaiming that this underwrites Kant’s insistence on the Ius Talionis.
Forcf Ypi – – European Journal of Philosophy 22 2: Kantian external freedom is not a matter of advantage, welfare or other “material” considerations, and the innate equality it involves is not a matter of an equal distribution of any benefit. But I’m sorry that Gadamer, though he lived to the age ofstill did not live freeeom enough to read it.
This requires a “postulate” not independently demonstrable that a free person may take control of an external object in rightful pursuit of an end. These rights further need to be secured, enforced and determined by the creation of a common power capable of establishing a “condition of right” — the sphere of “public right”.
Crime, Freedom and Civic Bonds: Ownership, as Ripstein emphasizes, has a “mine or yours” structure — involving the exclusion of others from the use of the thing pp. Chapter 6 turns to the need for a “rightful condition” or political state, and the role of legislation, executive power and the judiciary in constituting fodce state.
Harvard University Press The innate right to freedom over your ahd body must be “extended” to things outside you.
George Pavlakos – – Jurisprudence 1 2: Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Prominent themes include rights in the body, the relation treedom morality and law, the nature of frdedom and its role in legal obligation, the role of indeterminacy in law, the nature and justification of political society and the theory of the state.
Until now, however, I have never found the book Gadamer thought so badly needed to be freevom. There is no space here to say why I regard this interpretation of Kant, though sympathetic and philosophically plausible, to be textually indefensible. Ripstein’s book is a survey of the arguments through which Fotce constructs a theory that does all this, and a discussion of the issues of law and politics that arise in the course of doing it.
Readings in the Philosophy of Law. Here he focuses mainly on issues of the parental responsibilities for children, and avoids taking up the other applications Kant makes of this category, which most of us today would regard as indefensible, or at best only partly defensible.
Karl Olivecrona’s Legal Philosophy. Basic to this concept of freedom is being “your own master” sui jurisin contrast to being like a slave or serf subordinated to the will of another.