Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani A FAMOUS BOOK WRITTEN IN DEFENCE OF HAZRAT MUAVIA [R.A] Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad. Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Author Mufti Taqi Usmani. May Click to Download Click to Read on Scribd. Post a Comment. For More Islamic Books For More Islamic Books Visit For More I.
|Published (Last):||15 March 2015|
|PDF File Size:||17.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.4 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I’ll haqai you to study that procedure and apply that on the original source of all historical narrations compiled by Tabari. I hope you get my point. Mohadisin have devised a great procedure to evaluate authenticity of Hadith.
In the first century, even it was not possible to distinguish people as the dispute was only political and not religious. Haqai hope this will clarify my position on that. Nobody believes that Sahaba were free from sin.
Hazrat Muawiya( R. A) Aur Tarikhi Haqaiq
Therefore, there is no charge of revolt against him. Rest of the books are written on the basis of his compilation.
Although we are not sure about authenticity of such reports. Don’t hesitate to share your questions and comments. Because Sur am the student of history and I know what the Amir Muawia did in his 20 years rule.
Whatever is the opinion of Sunnis, Shias or Khawarij on such issues, it is no more than a theory based on doubtful reports because Sunni reports are not acceptable to Shia and vice versa.
Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani |
If some Sahaba had something wrong, Allah will not ask us about that but if they were really acquitted from naqaiq, we will be held responsible in front of Allah for believing in reports transmitted through doubtful channels.
It is completely wrong to compare him with culprits like Zia or Musharaf. I repeat the names: The approach muswiya Tabari was to compile all the narrations whether authentic or not in a chronological order.
But I’ll advise you to not rely on me and conduct your own study. I hope you got my point of view. Respected Sister Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah Many thanks for your kind words and comments about my books. The unchallenged information could only be the one which is available to us by ” Tawatur please see the link below ” which is not sufficient to give us a complete picture of the incident.
My objective of providing you with the book was to demonstrate that two points of view exist on this issue and both groups have their own arguments based on the reports compiled by Muawiyz Tabari.
You know that a theory means, “it might have happened “. I’ll sincerely advise you to leave this matter to Allah. Other than that, there is nothing except theories of different people. I respect the author of this book but it seems like he is just playing with the words. Since the matter is grave, we should evaluate muawiy authenticity of the events reported by the history. Musharrif ruled for 9 years because he is very patient. When I conducted such research, I found that almost all reports containing negative information about such companions was reported by one or more of the five narrators mentioned above.
Many thanks for your kind words and comments about my books.
Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah. I hope you ll not think that I am a Shia because ‘I am not’. Regards A Sister May Dear Brother Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah Thank you very much for answering me. Even we cannot reach at a decisive conclusion about events happening in our life. The same procedure could be applied to historical reports as well. We should not accept all incidents reported to us by historians without such evaluation. It aeer also reported in some narrations that he changed his decision once he found that a mhawiya has already been established there.
We are free to form opinions within this life.
Bad Blood :: Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Pdf Download
You can check by yourselves in the “History of Tabari ” that all reports portraying a sleazy picture of the companions are reported by only five persons and all of them are considered as “liars “. If someone portrays a bad picture of any respected person for you e. We know that some people are biased towards Tarekhi Abu BakrU’mar. Why should we not do so in this case and leave the matter to Allah for such people who passed away a long time before us and we do not have reliable information available to put a charge against them.
Large number of narrators who reported the incidents related to the civil wars of companion’s time were biased against the companions. All those who accepted their caliphate will tareekyi be charged automatically as they accepted corrupt rulers. Regards Respected Sister Wa ameee us salam wa Rahmatullah The views presented in the books belong to their authors and they are responsible for providing the answer raised on their work.
Tarefkhi cannot say about a theory that “it definitely has happened. There is a discipline in the historical studies that deals with criticism on historical events. If you know Arabic, you should study the history from its original source. I read the book thoroughly but I am sorry instead of making me satisfy it has made me more doubtful.